WHO Poll
Q: 2023/24 Hopes & aspirations for this season
a. As Champions of Europe there's no reason we shouldn't be pushing for a top 7 spot & a run in the Cups
24%
  
b. Last season was a trophy winning one and there's only one way to go after that, I expect a dull mid table bore fest of a season
17%
  
c. Buy some f***ing players or we're in a battle to stay up & that's as good as it gets
18%
  
d. Moyes out
38%
  
e. New season you say, woohoo time to get the new kit and wear it it to the pub for all the big games, the wags down there call me Mr West Ham
3%
  



Gavros 4:53 Sun Jul 30
The Juwes are at it again
The Sunday Times has been accused of antisemitism after it published an article in its Irish edition that suggested the BBC presenters Claudia Winkleman and Vanessa Feltz are well paid because they are Jewish.

The Rupert Murdoch-owned newspaper removed an online version of the piece by Holocaust denier Kevin Myers on Sunday morning amid a wave of outrage, but it appeared in printed editions of the newspaper across Ireland.

Under the headline “Sorry ladies, equal pay has to be earned”, Myers wrote: “I note that two of the best-paid women presenters in the BBC – Claudia Winkleman and Vanessa Feltz, with whose, no doubt, sterling work I am tragically unacquainted – are Jewish. Good for them.

“Jews are not generally noted for their insistence on selling their talent for the lowest possible price, which is the most useful measure there is of inveterate, lost-with-all-hands stupidity. I wonder, who are their agents? If they’re the same ones that negotiated the pay for the women on the lower scales, then maybe the latter have found their true value in the marketplace.”

Myers has previously written, in the Irish Independent: “There was no holocaust (or Holocaust, as my computer software insists) and six million Jews were not murdered by the Third Reich. These two statements of mine are irrefutable truths.”

https://www.theguardian.com/media/2017/jul/30/sunday-times-accused-of-antisemitism-over-column-on-bbc-presenters

Replies - Newest Posts First (Show In Chronological Order)

Gavros 2:01 Tue Aug 1
Re: The Juwes are at it again
you need Nurse for that sort of response

SurfaceAgentX2Zero 1:45 Tue Aug 1
Re: The Juwes are at it again
If you're looking for an empathetic, 'yum', from me, you can fuck right off. Try MumsNet. Or the woofter thread on here.

13 Brentford Rd 1:42 Tue Aug 1
Re: The Juwes are at it again
I could murder a cheese or smoked salmon one now.

SurfaceAgentX2Zero 1:21 Tue Aug 1
Re: The Juwes are at it again
No arguments here, 13BR.

I'm happy to promote 'beigal' at any opportunity.

13 Brentford Rd 1:13 Tue Aug 1
Re: The Juwes are at it again
Spelt Beigel too.

*Looks confrontationally at Surface*

SurfaceAgentX2Zero 12:39 Tue Aug 1
Re: The Juwes are at it again
Isn't it spelt 'bagel' pronounced 'beigal'?

Obviously when pronouncing it (correctly) as 'beigal' you have to look confrontationally at anyone non-cockney or non-Jewish in order to forestall any debate on the matter.

13 Brentford Rd 12:22 Tue Aug 1
Re: The Juwes are at it again
BEIGEL!

Gavros 11:31 Tue Aug 1
Re: The Juwes are at it again
"LAHammered 10:20 Mon Jul 31

Your probably a limp dick midget"

1. You're

2. What have you got against the impotent community?

3. What have you got against the dwarf community?

Gavros 11:24 Tue Aug 1
Re: The Juwes are at it again
Beigel.

It's the anti Semite in me.....

stewie griffin 10:57 Tue Aug 1
Re: The Juwes are at it again

LAHammered 10:20 Mon Jul 31
Re: The Juwes are at it again



Gavros you are a sad piece of crap

LondonE3 9:27 Tue Aug 1
Re: The Juwes are at it again
Beigel or Bagel?

Discuss

gph 2:05 Tue Aug 1
Re: The Juwes are at it again
Golden Oldie reckons there's a progression: Northern Soul, 1/8 Jewish, me 1/16, Gavros, almost human at 1/32.

I just wonder what GO's real KQ is

LAHammered 10:20 Mon Jul 31
Re: The Juwes are at it again
Gavros you are a sad piece of crap. You constantly write your anti semitic shit and hide behind this site, Your probably a limp dick midget and this place gives you a hard on. What's really sad is that you and people like your wife Texas have taken this site and put it on its last legs because its no longer contains even 40% West Ham.
Now you can gangster type because that's all you've got.

Gavros 4:21 Mon Jul 31
Re: The Juwes are at it again
yeah course, sold0, after all, you've personally never seen anyone get shot in good ole US of A so that means theres no crime, right?

Northern Sold 4:20 Mon Jul 31
Re: The Juwes are at it again
Good one.... your neighbourhood still on fire?? Give me South Central LA over your shit hole any day....

Gavros 3:07 Mon Jul 31
Re: The Juwes are at it again
Plenty of brownshirts in Rochford.....not that they are Nazis, just because theyre fucking filthy from all that bog dwellin'

Far Cough 3:04 Mon Jul 31
Re: The Juwes are at it again
I think they were black shirts or could have even been beige?

Northern Sold 1:53 Mon Jul 31
Re: The Juwes are at it again
Could have shoved up the good olde' fashioned Germanic `Juden' as well... I mean with Moseley's Brown Shirts and the mattresses burning in Cable Street it has some relevance??

SurfaceAgentX2Zero 1:46 Mon Jul 31
Re: The Juwes are at it again
If I can get all didactic on your ass, what makes this graffito so delicious is the ignorance displayed in the author's misspelling (and general jolly bad grammar) of the very people he hates.

SurfaceAgentX2Zero 1:42 Mon Jul 31
Re: The Juwes are at it again
Any Old Iron 1:00 Mon Jul 31

Mate, I'm always up for a pop at Gav, but his use of 'Juwes' is clearly ironic.

The famous misspelling was encountered on contemporary wall graffitti in Whitechapel, essentially blaming the Jews for the Jack the Ripper crimes.

I often use the spelling myself when ridiculing veiled or unconscious anti-Semitism on here. In fact, I post up 'the Jewes are the men who will not be blamed for nothing' in response to pretty much every post Golden Oldie makes.

Russ of the BML 1:40 Mon Jul 31
Re: The Juwes are at it again
This is all very odd. The original implication as well as the publication.

Page 1 - Next




Copyright 2006 WHO.NET | Powered by: